5 ms·
Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative works that will likely change.
by solarmist 4y ago
Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative works that will likely change.
- delecti 4y agoI suspect the mechanism of that will be that Disney lawyers and/or lobbyists will start throwing their weight around once AI trained on Disney media is making money for someone other than Disney.
- clouddrover 4y agoGetty Images is suing Stability AI for copyright infringement: https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-lawsuit-getty-images-stable-diffusion https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-... It's a bit hard to argue against. Stable Diffusion was trained on Getty's images and it does reproduce them, watermark included. Getty Images will win the case.
- fsckboy 4y agoGetty would still need to prove actual harm, like from use of those images.
- Gigachad 4y agoDisney IP is still safe. The tech can generate new content but it still isn’t legal to distribute.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative works It probably already is; the controversies make it likely people aren’t going to be overly forthcoming about their use of it, though.
- Gigachad 4y agoWhen have we ever decided to compensate people who were automated away?
- fsckboy 4y agothe point is the opposite, the AI cannot receive royalties because it is not entitled to copyright its work; unless it's changed, there will be no royalties for anybody including SkyNet