4 ms·
I'm not saying he should have taken the full 7 tons out of the ground without telling anybody. The least he could have done is excavate a small portion of the
by cld8483 4y ago
I'm not saying he should have taken the full 7 tons out of the ground without telling anybody. The least he could have done is excavate a small portion of the gold to prove any of it exists at all. Don't go to the feds until you have proof of at least that much. You don't need to extract all the gold to prove you found any gold.
> He suspects the agency conducted a clandestine, overnight dig between the first and second days of the court-authorized excavation, found the gold, and spirited it away.
If his claim is true and it took the government only one day and one night to extract 7 tons of gold, then it couldn't have been very deep. He should have dug some of it up. As it stands, this guy has no proof that any gold ever existed at all. He never even laid eyes on the supposed gold.
- mcv 4y agoI'm not entirely sure of the legalities here: would he have been allowed to dig up that gold? Would he be entitled to a finder's fee from the FBI? Reporting it instead of digging it up may well have been the right thing in this situation. And if the government had excavators, an army of trucks and possible other machinery, as the article suggests, then I don't see why they wouldn't have been able to extract 7 tons of gold in one night. And a lone treasure hunter may not have access to such resources.
- corbulo 4y agoI simply can't believe the gov is that efficient