4 ms·
The entire point of AI currently is to NOT remunerate.
by bombolo 4y ago
The entire point of AI currently is to NOT remunerate.
- solarmist 4y agoSure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative works that will likely change.
- delecti 4y agoI suspect the mechanism of that will be that Disney lawyers and/or lobbyists will start throwing their weight around once AI trained on Disney media is making money for someone other than Disney.
- clouddrover 4y agoGetty Images is suing Stability AI for copyright infringement: https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-lawsuit-getty-images-stable-diffusion https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-... It's a bit hard to argue against. Stable Diffusion was trained on Getty's images and it does reproduce them, watermark included. Getty Images will win the case.
- fsckboy 4y agoGetty would still need to prove actual harm, like from use of those images.
- Gigachad 4y agoDisney IP is still safe. The tech can generate new content but it still isn’t legal to distribute.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> Sure, but once it becomes commercially useful in creative works It probably already is; the controversies make it likely people aren’t going to be overly forthcoming about their use of it, though.
- Gigachad 4y agoWhen have we ever decided to compensate people who were automated away?
- fsckboy 4y agothe point is the opposite, the AI cannot receive royalties because it is not entitled to copyright its work; unless it's changed, there will be no royalties for anybody including SkyNet