That's an interesting point. I would agree that the attribution should clearly state "Revised in 2023 by Puffin" or something along these lines. As for: > Isn

That's an interesting point. I would agree that the attribution should clearly state "Revised in 2023 by Puffin" or something along these lines. As for: > Isn't it worth preserving how things were in the past? Oh, yes, absolutely, and this is why archivists and librarians have such an important profession; and also why copyright law sucks so much. Do be angry at copyright law, don't be angry at the decision to modernize the texts.