3 ms·
A co-op doesn't mean everyone must share profits equally. How about an internal market where people bid for tickets? There are crypto projects facilitating go
by danuker 4y ago
A co-op doesn't mean everyone must share profits equally.
How about an internal market where people bid for tickets?
There are crypto projects facilitating governance of organizations. They could help both enforce and simplify keeping records. Example: https://aragon.org/ https://aragon.org/
Edit: Earlier I suggested hiring people for internal-money, but that might be tax evasion. Don't do it without consulting lawyers in your country.
- bilqis 4y agoNo reason to turn everything into market, and use blockchain for voting automation or partial governance, especially seeing what clownshow DAOs have been.
- danuker 4y agoYou could have a plain Reddit clone web server for governance, and whatever compensation the group deems fair, to account for the work done by each member.
- hankish 4y ago+1 for using marketplace dynamics, particularly when you want groups to be able to grow to be quite large. (For small groups they are overkill and potentially harmful.) This can be done without involving anything crypto related too. A great design principle to incorporate is Stigmergy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmergy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmergy To be clear though: Just because folks talk about using "markets" doesn't mean those marketplaces have to be built around "currencies" as we typically imagine them (crypto currencies included). They can be built around anything that can be counted or conceptualized numerically. For instance, HN / reddit votes are a type of stigmergic marketplace. When designed effectively, markets can be massively scalable engines for human consensus.