>What he's talking about is if you produce a thing, no matter how you produce it, you have the right to determine what you want to do with that product. The th

>What he's talking about is if you produce a thing, no matter how you produce it, you have the right to determine what you want to do with that product. The thing produced here is a derivative work that contains Apple created code and content. Taking your words and changing the context produces this: "if you produce a [some software], no matter how you produce it, [or who elses code you include with it.] you have the right to determine what [license agreement you use]." See how that doesn't work?