6 ms·

Does hand-washing or wearing masks slow down the spread of respiratory viruses?

superkuh 4y ago
You can say these meta-studies means masks and hand washing don't help for large populations and you're right. But it's not because masks and handwashing don't work. It's because people on average are too stupid or otherwise cranky to wear them properly (ie, fit and sealed) and consistently. It's not hard to wear a sealed N95 consistently and wash your hands when you come home. But almost no one will do this for years long time spans. That's what these meta-studies of populations capture: human laziness and stupidity.
- blindriver 4y ago
  The only real way to judge this is by measuring experts, ie. hospital staff. They are well trained and you can expect consistent results. Any studies that employ the population at large is going to devolve to nothingness because they won't be consistent and eventually over long periods of time, they will slip up and given how contagious COVID is, they will get infected. Then people can turn to the study and say "SEE! THEY DON'T WORK!" If the study is focusing on the question "Does it make sense to tell the general public to wash and wear a mask?" I think that's a different question than whether or not masks and hand washing protect people.
  - taeric 4y ago
    Troubling here, I don't know a single medical staffer that did not get covid. So... I'm not sure this would give different results. This is dangerously close to the arguments that you can write safe C code. Logically, that is perfectly true. Empirically, it is a non-sequitur.
    - blindriver 4y ago
      If even experts can't avoid getting COVID, it means that regardless of how effective masks are, it's impossible to avoid COVID over a long time period. So the effectiveness of masks is moot, because the difficulty in its perfect use is too high.
      - taeric 4y ago
        I wouldn't take it quite that far. Given enough time behind the wheel, everyone will crash a car, after all. Doesn't mean we can't take measures that greatly reduce the severity and rate of crashes.
- taeric 4y ago
  I mean... not wrong, but how good of adherence do you think you can realistically get? Especially knowing that we are also talking about school age people, too. That is, I am very interested in how effective of an idea it is. If normal adherence can only get me a 5% reduction in risk, I can understand why I may not want to bother. If it can get me 50-80% reduction, that changes things in the other direction. As such, I'm glad there are folks doing these studies.
  - superkuh 4y ago
    I know how well I can adhere. That's all that matters. That other people act like children does not change the reality that well fit N95 mask and good hand hygiene works. You should not base your decisions off meta study based on false premises (ie, most don't actually mask up properly). The article headline should be, "Can the majority of people act more responsibly re: infectious diseases than a kindergartner?" and the answer is no. And that only encourages me to keep it up.
    - taeric 4y ago
      As a criticism of this meta study, I think this is fair. As a criticism of the idea for knowing the efficacy of masks, this is shortsighted. More, comparing the majority of folks to kindergartners is... not helpful. I trust you have managed to avoid getting sick period for your entire non-kindergartner life? Do you know how much "better" you would have had to have been to do so?
      - superkuh 4y ago
        That's correct. I still have not been infected with sars-cov-2 three years into the pandemic. I haven't tested for the N protein immune reactivity in my blood or anything, but I have been extremely careful about exposure and rapid test regularly. It's the same for my local family which also mask properly with N95. It is very possible to not get infected and infect others. So yeah, I will call people who refuse to wear masks kindergarteners having hissy fits.
- ccn0p 4y ago
  there's theory, and there's reality. As mostly engineers here we'd love to live in theory, but that's not how the world works.
Scalene2 4y ago
This part in the section about limitations tells me that the only reasonable conclusion is that more data is needed: > Relatively low numbers of people followed the guidance about wearing masks or about hand hygiene, which may have affected the results of the studies.
- readthenotes1 4y ago
  how much more data do you need to know that many people wear masks on their chin and everyone takes them off in restaurants?
  - Scalene2 4y ago
    The question being asked: "Does hand-washing or wearing masks slow down the spread of respiratory viruses?" Your question has nothing to do with the question being asked.
mmastrac 4y ago
It's good they published this, but it's effectively a zero for any data either way. They did manage to find a small benefit to hand-washing, but overall there's no way to judge mask use as a clear benefit or not. "Evidence is limited by imprecision and heterogeneity for these subjective outcomes."
- rippercushions 4y ago
  However, if there was a strong effect, it would have shown up in this study. So now we know that even if masks do "work", the effect is relatively small at best.
  - mmastrac 4y ago
    That's not what the study says at all.
robertheadley 4y ago
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/multiple-studies-show-face-masks-reduce-spread-of-covid-19-cochrane-review-doesnt-demonstrate-otherwise/ https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/multiple-studies-show... "Inadequate support: Claims that face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of COVID-19 based on a Cochrane review didn’t take into account the limitations of the review. While many users presented this review as the highest-quality evidence, the individual studies it evaluated varied greatly in terms of quality, study design, populations studied, and outcomes observed, which prevented the authors from drawing any definitive conclusions."
- rippercushions 4y ago
  This rebuttal is less than convincing. The core of the argument seems to be that a lot of right wingers are saying the study "proves masks don't work", which it doesn't. But it doesn't really address the study's actual finding, which is that we're not seeing evidence that masks work.
  - Scalene2 4y ago
    1. That is not what the study found. 2. The reason that there is limited evidence that masks work is that the effort required to collect more than limited evidence that masks work has not been undertaken.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
pella 4y ago
- https://theconversation.com/yes-masks-reduce-the-risk-of-spreading-covid-despite-a-review-saying-they-dont-198992 https://theconversation.com/yes-masks-reduce-the-risk-of-spr... - https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/02/covid-mask-guidelines-fight-cochrane-review/673039/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/02/covid-mas...
blindriver 4y ago
Conclusion: No hard conclusion can be drawn.
cameldrv 4y ago
Hardly any of their studies are about COVID. The virus itself as well behavior relative to the virus are very different. I don't see how this meta analysis adds any value to the question of the effectiveness of masks relative to COVID.
robertheadley 4y ago
I asked Bing ChatGPT. Are masks effective at preventing covid-19 infection? According to various sources¹²³⁴⁵, masks can help slow the spread of COVID-19 when worn consistently and correctly, along with other preventive measures such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing. However, some masks offer higher levels of protection than others². What type of mask are you interested in? Source: Conversation with Bing, 2/20/2023(1) How well do face masks protect against COVID-19? - Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449 https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/i... Accessed 2/20/2023. (2) Types of Masks and Respirators - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/types-of-masks.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si... Accessed 2/20/2023. (3) Do face masks really reduce coronavirus spread? - Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/are-face-masks-effective-reducing-coronavirus-spread.html https://www.livescience.com/are-face-masks-effective-reducin... Accessed 2/20/2023. (4) Use Masks to Slow the Spread of COVID-19 - Centers for Disease Control .... https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/masks.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si... Accessed 2/20/2023. (5) Mayo Clinic research confirms critical role of masks in preventing .... https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-research-confirms-critical-role-of-masks-in-preventing-covid-19-infection/ https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-re... Accessed 2/20/2023.
kthejoker2 4y ago
All of these studies continue to show that adherence is the key variable. Of course in an absolute sense wearing mask, hand-washing, social distancing, etc. for a short period of time will marginally (even if microscopically) decrease your chances of acquiring a virus. Just like brushing your teeth once absolutely reduces the amount of plaque on your teeth. But it's adherence, over a long period of time which tells the tale of whether you get sick or have a cavity.
ksaj 4y ago
They used to post graphics that basically said masks only work if you and the infectious person are both wearing masks. In other words, if only the uninfected person is wearing a mask, or if only the infected person is wearing a mask, all bets are off. Basically they all demonstrated that you need a mask to keep some of the infectious stuff out of the air, and another mask to avoid as much breathing in what the infected person's mask didn't filter. I imagine that has not changed. It's hard to tell though because none of the subsequent tests seem to ever take that into account.
richij 4y ago
Bangs head on desk. Cochrane is asking the wrong question (or, at least, too narrow a question). This meta-analysis looks at efficacy of masks to protect the wearer. Whereas the primary need is to catch infected droplets before they infect someone else.

You can say these meta-studies means masks and hand washing don't help for large populations and you're right. But it's not because masks and handwashing don't work. It's because people on average are too stupid or otherwise cranky to wear them properly (ie, fit and sealed) and consistently. It's not hard to wear a sealed N95 consistently and wash your hands when you come home. But almost no one will do this for years long time spans. That's what these meta-studies of populations capture: human laziness and stupidity.

blindriver 4y ago
The only real way to judge this is by measuring experts, ie. hospital staff. They are well trained and you can expect consistent results. Any studies that employ the population at large is going to devolve to nothingness because they won't be consistent and eventually over long periods of time, they will slip up and given how contagious COVID is, they will get infected. Then people can turn to the study and say "SEE! THEY DON'T WORK!" If the study is focusing on the question "Does it make sense to tell the general public to wash and wear a mask?" I think that's a different question than whether or not masks and hand washing protect people.
- taeric 4y ago
  Troubling here, I don't know a single medical staffer that did not get covid. So... I'm not sure this would give different results. This is dangerously close to the arguments that you can write safe C code. Logically, that is perfectly true. Empirically, it is a non-sequitur.
  - blindriver 4y ago
    If even experts can't avoid getting COVID, it means that regardless of how effective masks are, it's impossible to avoid COVID over a long time period. So the effectiveness of masks is moot, because the difficulty in its perfect use is too high.
    - taeric 4y ago
      I wouldn't take it quite that far. Given enough time behind the wheel, everyone will crash a car, after all. Doesn't mean we can't take measures that greatly reduce the severity and rate of crashes.
taeric 4y ago
I mean... not wrong, but how good of adherence do you think you can realistically get? Especially knowing that we are also talking about school age people, too. That is, I am very interested in how effective of an idea it is. If normal adherence can only get me a 5% reduction in risk, I can understand why I may not want to bother. If it can get me 50-80% reduction, that changes things in the other direction. As such, I'm glad there are folks doing these studies.
- superkuh 4y ago
  I know how well I can adhere. That's all that matters. That other people act like children does not change the reality that well fit N95 mask and good hand hygiene works. You should not base your decisions off meta study based on false premises (ie, most don't actually mask up properly). The article headline should be, "Can the majority of people act more responsibly re: infectious diseases than a kindergartner?" and the answer is no. And that only encourages me to keep it up.
  - taeric 4y ago
    As a criticism of this meta study, I think this is fair. As a criticism of the idea for knowing the efficacy of masks, this is shortsighted. More, comparing the majority of folks to kindergartners is... not helpful. I trust you have managed to avoid getting sick period for your entire non-kindergartner life? Do you know how much "better" you would have had to have been to do so?
    - superkuh 4y ago
      That's correct. I still have not been infected with sars-cov-2 three years into the pandemic. I haven't tested for the N protein immune reactivity in my blood or anything, but I have been extremely careful about exposure and rapid test regularly. It's the same for my local family which also mask properly with N95. It is very possible to not get infected and infect others. So yeah, I will call people who refuse to wear masks kindergarteners having hissy fits.
ccn0p 4y ago
there's theory, and there's reality. As mostly engineers here we'd love to live in theory, but that's not how the world works.

Scalene2 4y ago

This part in the section about limitations tells me that the only reasonable conclusion is that more data is needed: > Relatively low numbers of people followed the guidance about wearing masks or about hand hygiene, which may have affected the results of the studies.

readthenotes1 4y ago
how much more data do you need to know that many people wear masks on their chin and everyone takes them off in restaurants?
- Scalene2 4y ago
  The question being asked: "Does hand-washing or wearing masks slow down the spread of respiratory viruses?" Your question has nothing to do with the question being asked.

mmastrac 4y ago

It's good they published this, but it's effectively a zero for any data either way. They did manage to find a small benefit to hand-washing, but overall there's no way to judge mask use as a clear benefit or not. "Evidence is limited by imprecision and heterogeneity for these subjective outcomes."

rippercushions 4y ago
However, if there was a strong effect, it would have shown up in this study. So now we know that even if masks do "work", the effect is relatively small at best.
- mmastrac 4y ago
  That's not what the study says at all.

robertheadley 4y ago

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/multiple-studies-show-face-masks-reduce-spread-of-covid-19-cochrane-review-doesnt-demonstrate-otherwise/ https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/multiple-studies-show... "Inadequate support: Claims that face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of COVID-19 based on a Cochrane review didn’t take into account the limitations of the review. While many users presented this review as the highest-quality evidence, the individual studies it evaluated varied greatly in terms of quality, study design, populations studied, and outcomes observed, which prevented the authors from drawing any definitive conclusions."

rippercushions 4y ago
This rebuttal is less than convincing. The core of the argument seems to be that a lot of right wingers are saying the study "proves masks don't work", which it doesn't. But it doesn't really address the study's actual finding, which is that we're not seeing evidence that masks work.
- Scalene2 4y ago
  1. That is not what the study found. 2. The reason that there is limited evidence that masks work is that the effort required to collect more than limited evidence that masks work has not been undertaken.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

pella 4y ago

- https://theconversation.com/yes-masks-reduce-the-risk-of-spreading-covid-despite-a-review-saying-they-dont-198992 https://theconversation.com/yes-masks-reduce-the-risk-of-spr... - https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/02/covid-mask-guidelines-fight-cochrane-review/673039/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2023/02/covid-mas...

blindriver 4y ago

Conclusion: No hard conclusion can be drawn.

cameldrv 4y ago

Hardly any of their studies are about COVID. The virus itself as well behavior relative to the virus are very different. I don't see how this meta analysis adds any value to the question of the effectiveness of masks relative to COVID.

robertheadley 4y ago

I asked Bing ChatGPT. Are masks effective at preventing covid-19 infection? According to various sources¹²³⁴⁵, masks can help slow the spread of COVID-19 when worn consistently and correctly, along with other preventive measures such as getting vaccinated, frequent hand-washing and physical distancing. However, some masks offer higher levels of protection than others². What type of mask are you interested in? Source: Conversation with Bing, 2/20/2023(1) How well do face masks protect against COVID-19? - Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449 https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/i... Accessed 2/20/2023. (2) Types of Masks and Respirators - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/types-of-masks.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si... Accessed 2/20/2023. (3) Do face masks really reduce coronavirus spread? - Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/are-face-masks-effective-reducing-coronavirus-spread.html https://www.livescience.com/are-face-masks-effective-reducin... Accessed 2/20/2023. (4) Use Masks to Slow the Spread of COVID-19 - Centers for Disease Control .... https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/masks.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-si... Accessed 2/20/2023. (5) Mayo Clinic research confirms critical role of masks in preventing .... https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-research-confirms-critical-role-of-masks-in-preventing-covid-19-infection/ https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-re... Accessed 2/20/2023.

kthejoker2 4y ago

All of these studies continue to show that adherence is the key variable. Of course in an absolute sense wearing mask, hand-washing, social distancing, etc. for a short period of time will marginally (even if microscopically) decrease your chances of acquiring a virus. Just like brushing your teeth once absolutely reduces the amount of plaque on your teeth. But it's adherence, over a long period of time which tells the tale of whether you get sick or have a cavity.

ksaj 4y ago

They used to post graphics that basically said masks only work if you and the infectious person are both wearing masks. In other words, if only the uninfected person is wearing a mask, or if only the infected person is wearing a mask, all bets are off. Basically they all demonstrated that you need a mask to keep some of the infectious stuff out of the air, and another mask to avoid as much breathing in what the infected person's mask didn't filter. I imagine that has not changed. It's hard to tell though because none of the subsequent tests seem to ever take that into account.

richij 4y ago

Bangs head on desk. Cochrane is asking the wrong question (or, at least, too narrow a question). This meta-analysis looks at efficacy of masks to protect the wearer. Whereas the primary need is to catch infected droplets before they infect someone else.