> This is not true in the slightest. Clearly a post made in bad faith. You seem to think I don't have a lot of experience playing these games, if you are goin

> This is not true in the slightest. Clearly a post made in bad faith. You seem to think I don't have a lot of experience playing these games, if you are going to assert that RT makes so much difference to the player experience (other than reducing performance). I am certain that the majority of gamers could not effectively discern what "RTX On" actually means without being trained to know what to look for. You hear things like "it's shinier" from people. This is often true even when they are looking at clips or screenshots, let alone while they are concentrating on actually playing. What percentage of players even understand that a game advertising RT may only be using it for shadows, for example? As we have this discussion, the biggest release is Hogwarts Legacy, for which there are support forums full of people complaining about performance issues so they can see a stained glass window reflected (on a stone floor!?) like its a mirror. I hope you understand that the marketing spin to which I was referring is the very idea that RT is needed to make a modern game look good in the first place. You seem to really care about it. To me it's just another thing to put on the box like 4k, 8k, HDR, etc. Things that do look good, especially in awe-inspiring screenshots, but have essentially no impact on my actual enjoyment of the game.