And that 37-50 percent is just what is necessary to sustain the people already on benefits there, in that geographical location. If you throw in people that li

And that 37-50 percent is just what is necessary to sustain the people already on benefits there, in that geographical location. If you throw in people that live in earthquake/typhoon/volcanic/etc locales, with different diseases and food production, natural resources, climate, and scale up the population of people to administer all those benefits by a couple orders of magnitude, you can bet you’ll be paying a lot more in taxes to try to afford the same quality of life for everyone.