3 ms·
Support it better (shoveling money at it is probably necessary but not sufficient), ration care to prioritise workers (this is usually considered distasteful) o
by Oxidation 4y ago
Support it better (shoveling money at it is probably necessary but not sufficient), ration care to prioritise workers (this is usually considered distasteful) or do nothing and drag down the general health and economic condition of the entire population.
Basically, the system is thrashing: you can add RAM, make processes more efficient, oomkill "unimportant" things, or live with a virtually paralysed system.
- lotsofpulp 4y agoEveryone knows this. It is just a hard problem to solve due to the politically difficult task of > ration care to prioritise workers Who make up a good portion of voters. In an aging society that has promised its people healthcare, it becomes a fight between old and young as there are more limited resources to go around (absent sufficient automation).
- shapefrog 4y ago> ration care to prioritise workers - Who make up a good portion of voters The people recieving this priority are not likely to be voters for the current government. Those who would be deprioritised, Tory voters.