3 ms·

Yes, that is certainly true, but in this case it is irrelevant because it is my server's IP address that is being banned. I am sending email to people with who

• klabb3 4y ago
  Parent poster here. Assuming malicious actors can easily set up all the fancy acronyms to verify the sender’s identity, how should spam be prevented if not through IP reputation (and whatever else they have today)? Should the reputation apply to the domain name instead? Would that protect against Sybil attacks? To my knowledge, these systems are proprietary, obscure secret sauce heuristics. My point is that we should find a way to do spam prevention in an open and easy to implement way. Such an algorithm could then be applied to any open-inbox system, not just email.
  • lisper 4y ago
    > Assuming malicious actors can easily set up all the fancy acronyms to verify the sender’s identity How is a malicious actor going to set up a fake SPF record for my domain without compromising my DNS account? It makes sense to block a domain even with a correct SPF record. It makes no sense to block an IP with a correct SPF record for a domain that you already trust. And, like I said, I'm getting bounced mail from people I've been corresponding with for years, so I know the recipient email providers do trust the domain. They're just being stupid with IP black listing.