Video steganography might be a better approach and would be less likely to trigger account banning or claims of abuse by the hosters. The issue of avoiding dat

Video steganography might be a better approach and would be less likely to trigger account banning or claims of abuse by the hosters. The issue of avoiding data loss due to lossy compression algorithms seems to be an active area of research: https://jis-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13635-022-00130-z https://jis-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/articles/10.118... > "Moreover, most video-sharing channels transmit the steganographic video in a lossy way to reduce transmission bandwidth or storage space, such as YouTube and Twitter. . . Robust video steganography aims to send secret messages to the receiver through lossy channels without arousing any suspicions from the observer. Thus, the robustness against lossy channels, the security against steganalysis, and the embedding capacity are equally important." I suppose in this project, the blocks of pixels are large enough to avoid data loss due to compression?