4 ms·
I've observed that with any piece technology where you're permitted to write / upload information and freely access it afterwards, someone will attempt to (ab)u
by selfmodruntime 4y ago
I've observed that with any piece technology where you're permitted to write / upload information and freely access it afterwards, someone will attempt to (ab)use it for file storage and write a blog article about it later :)
My favorite example of this was people storing files in "secret" subreddits by using posts and comments to store bytes. When they were later discovered by other users, the seemingly random strings sparked a huge conspiracy about their possible meaning.
However, you always have the problem that your unwilling host may remove your "files". I sometimes wonder about file storage using a textual output format that can't be distinguished from normal user interactions.
- codetrotter 4y agoI remember when GMail was by invite only, and at the time they were offering quite a larger amount of storage for Mail than anyone else so people started using their GMail drafts to store files. That was the first time I can across such a thing. Someone even made an extension for Windows XP that allowed you to mount GMail as a storage volume. > GMail Drive is a Shell Namespace Extension that creates a virtual filesystem around your Google Mail account, allowing you to use Gmail as a storage medium. http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm
- meltyness 4y agoGmailFS was another early implementation.
- coffeeblack 4y agoNow I want to write a blog post about storing files inside of blog posts about storing files inside of blog posts …<error: recursion limit reached>
- selfmodruntime 4y agoThis makes me think of Turing machines which store their own code inside them selves, which you can use for all kinds of interesting proofs. I wish I could find more about this.
- t344344 4y agoLook into Squeak/Smalltalk. It is an operating system/desktop/IDE with self contained compiler.
- phh 4y ago> I sometimes wonder about file storage using a textual output format that can't be distinguished from normal user interactions. You could use a reproducible LM (for instance using Bellard's NNCP as basis), and encode one bit in one word by taking the {first, second} most probable next word.
- animuchan 4y agoThis is fascinating! And the file transfer can be then fully disguised as a conversation, with a ChatGPT-like client and all. An unsuspecting user will see a chat bot; a specialized client app would be able to receive files by talking to it.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- diceduckmonk 4y ago> I sometimes wonder about file storage using a textual output format that can't be distinguished from normal user interactions. I guess it depends on what noise-to-signal density you’re after. With a a long enough ChatGPT generated output, no one would question a few out of place characters or even an emoji. With 3000+ different emojis to choose from that encodes an entire byte of data. Another idea is using “they’re”, “their”, “there” as bits.
- sgerenser 4y agoI vaguely recall some secretive company (perhaps Apple) using adjustment of spacing, capitalization, etc. to encode a unique serial number in messages sent by the CEO, which could then be used to trace leaks.
- joaonmatos 4y agoElon Musk was the one claiming to do it
- mattkrause 4y agoMany people claim to do it. It's a plot point in a Patriot Games, a 1987 Tom Clancy novel that introduced the term "canary trap" for this trick. He says he invented the term, but not the technique, which was already in use. In a spat over the plot of Star Trek III (so, early 1980s), Harve Bennett distributed slightly different versions of the script, allowing him to track a leak back to Gene Roddenberry. The book SpyCatcher says it was in routine use at MI-5, and you can find variations of it in lots of fiction too.
- vlunkr 4y agoGenius.com hid the message “red-handed” in Morse code using alternating quote characters to prove that Google was displaying their lyrics.
- xen2xen1 4y agoCIA and similar have been doing that for something like 50 years. Made it into Tom Clancy novels in the 80s IIRC.
- BlueTemplar 4y agoIn completely unrelated Hacker News : "Ask HN: What are these strange random strings spamming my blog?" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34865695 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34865695
- nullc 4y agoPretty easy to do that, use a fixed point implementation of GPT(N) of whatever size you like and range code your data into the model probabilities. This also will achieve a close to rate optimal embedding-- allowing you to embed about as much data as the language model thinks the text has... If you encrypt the data and include a checksum or other identifying bytes in the ciphertext you can even have unwitting human participants in the discussions and if their posts are context your embedded data will be credible replies. You just have to be sure that threading behavior doesn't make it impossible to give the decoder identical context.
- INTPenis 4y agoIn this modern cloud-giant world it's abused for file storage yes. But I come from the more traditional web hosting world of the early 2000s and back then the general rule was that anything that could store information online would sooner or later be used to store porn.
- petercooper 4y agoHow about storing your files in other people's DNS caches? https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/dns-filesystem-true-cloud-storage-dnsfs https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/dns-filesystem-true-cloud-st...
- metadat 4y agoDiscussed 5 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16134041 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16134041 (36 comments)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- adolph 4y ago> When they were later discovered by other users, the seemingly random strings sparked a huge conspiracy about their possible meaning. Makes me wonder if numbers stations are actually just the worlds slowest modems
- dtx1 4y ago> However, you always have the problem that your unwilling host may remove your "files". I sometimes wonder about file storage using a textual output format that can't be distinguished from normal user interactions. Well, with Chat GPT that's almost trival. POC https://imgur.com/fQvMh9S https://imgur.com/fQvMh9S