Yeah! The second part of a prima facie case for policy change is to show that the proposed solution solves the problem. The third part is to show that the prop

Yeah! The second part of a prima facie case for policy change is to show that the proposed solution solves the problem. The third part is to show that the proposed solution doesn't cause more problems than it solves. That would be "cost/benefit analysis". Show us that a problem exists, that someone gets harmed, and how much that harm amounts to. And please, don't use propaganda techniques. You'll just look bad.