4 ms·
"Most of these leaked out of the cars without vapourizing and ended up in the Ohio river causing some damage to wildlife." SOME? I have seen lot of pictures th
by spants 4y ago
"Most of these leaked out of the cars without vapourizing and ended up in the Ohio river causing some damage to wildlife."
SOME? I have seen lot of pictures that show a complete anhilation of the local fish population and contamination of the water supplies (strange deposits when boiled).
I think that there is a huge coverup ongoing.
- op00to 4y agoPlease provide said photos, and while you're at it, proof that these photos are indeed recent and taken in the watershed affected by the incident. I hear this over and over and over, but I've never seen actual evidence that these pictures are authentic AND reflect the widespread condition of the area.
- McSwag 4y agoI honestly haven’t seen much detailed information in the major news outlets other than there was a train derailed, a burn, some fish died, some people were evacuated, everything okay and safe now, “by the way we shot down some UFOs”, “do aliens exist?” It’s possible I’m missing something but for whatever reason I don’t feel like it’s getting the coverage it really deserves which, by itself, raises questions.
- op00to 4y agoIt’s the only thing I’ve heard about. I think there’s some rat fuckery going on, I agree. I’m not so sure it’s a cover up orchestrated or enabled by the government as much as other actors using the opportunity to stoke distrust in the government.
- PM_me_your_math 4y agoAfter the last two years, you don't need anything to help distrust the government. This administration has been a total disaster in all key policy areas. From energy to transportation to foreign policy. A total mess for seemingly no reason.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoReally, no one has provided a link to any credible images?
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoWhat are credible images anyway nowadays? The source of the images is what gives them credibility. A person that you trust.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoYes, the credibly of the source is commonly understood to contribute to the overall credibility of an image.
- op00to 4y agoI'd trust AP or AFP to have pictures showing the environmental damage with the correct context.
- heliodor 4y agoIf you come at it with that attitude, then nothing can be trusted. Unless you go do the work yourself, you're going to have to trust others with the work!
- lm28469 4y agoPlease provide the official air measurements as well as a proof they're recent and taken in the affected area with no manipulation Same for water Oh wait, nobody can https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/11480zm/east_palestine_oh_water_condition/ https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/11480zm/east_palest... https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1626311330964676610 https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status/1626311330964676610
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rambojohnson 4y agoWhy don’t you go out to the site yourself? The burden of proof is on you. Nobody should go out of their way to try and convince some rando on the internet.
- op00to 4y agoI'm not making claims about the environmental impact of this disaster. Typically the person making the claims provides evidence backing up their claims.
- bawolff 4y ago"Some" is a pretty broad term. It can't really be a cover up if the claim is that vauge. Like "some" can mean anything from nothing at all to total dead zone.