4 ms·
On the main subject of URL shortening services, I think they work well especially if you set up your own. Although mass-marketed URL shortening services like bi
by ravagat 4y ago
On the main subject of URL shortening services, I think they work well especially if you set up your own. Although mass-marketed URL shortening services like bitly and tinyurl have also been abused by bad actors I still think they are good services to you use both as end/customer user and start/creator(?) user.
On the secondary subject of broken URLs and historical archiving in a sense, I think there is no issue as is. I type this because I think it many cases archiving information on the internet for the sake of strictly keeping historical data and such is a feat in itself that I have yet to see anyone competent and prolific enough to do it, if anything I would advocate for anyone and everyone as an active internet user to partake their own individual archiving of what is worth keeping. Simply put, it is and continues to be a free for all in that sense. I do commend and am a fan of what archive.org and the archive team (two separate entities) are doing but I also don't rely on them wholly. I have my own small setup. On that subject, I'm curious if anyone else here has?