5 ms·
Maybe Boeing would like to make a project like this, using Python, but running on actual aircraft with passengers.
by midoridensha 4y ago
Maybe Boeing would like to make a project like this, using Python, but running on actual aircraft with passengers.
- rootw0rm 4y agoI'd rather have other snakes on the plane
- hef19898 4y agoThe majority of the people on board any given plane have no idea what's on the cargo manifest, it could be snakes... More likely so some of the passengers is trying traffic a snake or two.
- heywhatupboys 4y agowhat holds back aviation is surely lack of Pythonics!
- liftm 4y ago> that would kill people.
- TheRealPomax 4y agoNo thanks, we don't need another 737 Max.
- midoridensha 4y agoYes, we do: what consequences did Boeing suffer for that debacle that killed hundreds?
- TheRealPomax 4y agoNote that you just says "yes, we do need hundreds more dead in the hopes of putting tens of thousands of people out of a job". Not sure I'm down with that. Boeing lost hundreds of millions (that it already worked into its budget) from cancelled orders alone. Just because the law didn't do enough according to you, doesn't mean you should be okay with (let alone advocate for) people dying just to teach a company a lesson. What you want is for a company whose planes end up causing catastrophe to stay in business and never make planes like that again, because no one wins when a large aircraft manufacturer gets shut down. I would like to see all the execs involved in pushing through the "no no it's still a 737 no new training required" bullshit to get fired on the spot, without bonuses, but that's not my call to make, nor even the law's. Unless they want to sue each exec individually, which would have to be brought before the courts by "not the government". Because government is (for good reasons) not allows to meddle with how a private company is structured internally.
- midoridensha 4y ago>Note that you just says "yes, we do need hundreds more dead in the hopes of putting tens of thousands of people out of a job". Not sure I'm down with that. Well then you disagree with Boeing and the aviation regulators then. >Just because the law didn't do enough according to you, doesn't mean you should be okay with (let alone advocate for) people dying just to teach a company a lesson. Many more will die because the regulators aren't regulating and no one has been held responsible. >Because government is (for good reasons) not allows to meddle with how a private company is structured internally. So mass murder is Ok as long as it's done by a corporate executive?
- TheRealPomax 4y agoKid, you're advocating for mass murder. Check your intentions and reign them in.
- _hypx 4y agoThis is only a partial joke. It could really happen in a real airplane someday.
- midoridensha 4y agoWell we already see how Boeing takes safety seriously with the 737MAX...