If you're going to talk about Feynman's equations and use the double slit experiment as an illustration instead of using Feynman diagrams (good explanation by p

If you're going to talk about Feynman's equations and use the double slit experiment as an illustration instead of using Feynman diagrams (good explanation by pbs space time here https://youtu.be/fG52mXN-uWI https://youtu.be/fG52mXN-uWI), I'd say you're doing the concept a disservice. Extrapolating that to philosophy is usually risky, especially when doing it to a general audience. Also, I feel we should stop trying to explain quantum physics approximately AND do philosophy based on it in short articles. It's too hard to convey that "a possible reality" may mean something else than you traditionally expect in quantum mechanics, or that it's an interpretation of what the math implies. A general public always leaves with an inaccurate impression of what was written.