5 ms·
That’s sad. CSS Tricks has always been an amazing resource, "A Complete Guide to Flexbox" [0] is probably my most referenced article. I really hope a new stewar
by Semaphor 4y ago
That’s sad. CSS Tricks has always been an amazing resource, "A Complete Guide to Flexbox" [0] is probably my most referenced article. I really hope a new steward appears.
[0]: https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/ https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
- camillomiller 4y agoJust saved it offline.
- jamesfinlayson 4y agoMe too! I remember looking at that page endlessly in around 2014 when my then boss decided that flexbox was in wide enough use that we could use it. The diagrams made it extra useful.
- k3liutZu 4y agoI'm still opening this up whenever I have to do anything with flex.
- hnbad 4y agoCSS Tricks was mostly defined by Chris. When he sold it off to Digital Ocean and left, there was a noticeable change in quality. I'm surprised they didn't either shelve it soon after or turn it into a pure marketing vehicle.
- azangru 4y ago> When he sold it off to Digital Ocean and left, there was a noticeable change in quality. Yes, absolutely.
- robertwt7 4y agoomg same!! i have visited this page soo many times the first 6 months of my first web dev job. Really sad to see this, hoping all the best for OP
- azangru 4y ago> "A Complete Guide to Flexbox" is probably my most referenced article. I'll just put it out there that web.dev is becoming a more and more awesome resource to learn web technologies. Their page on flexbox is very detailed: https://web.dev/learn/css/flexbox/ https://web.dev/learn/css/flexbox/
- codetrotter 4y agoBut that site is owned by Google :(
- azangru 4y agoAnd MDN is owned by Mozilla :-) Between the two of them, I think we've got ourselves covered.
- codetrotter 4y agoYes MDN is excellent
- enumjorge 4y agoIt’s more than web.dev simply being owned by Google, at times the site feels like content marketing for Chrome and not just a resource to learn about web development. I’ve seen them post multiple articles about the latest Chrome-only updates, while I’ve never seen MDN promote content that only focuses on Firefox. Not to say MDN has never done that, but at least to me, web.dev has a definite Chrome bent that you wouldn’t expect from the way the site initially presents itself.
- jefftk 4y ago> I’ve never seen MDN promote content that only focuses on Firefox They do, which I think is totally fine: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Firefox_differentiators https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web...
- toastal 4y agoOne of my go-to links has always been “When to use target="_blank"” https://css-tricks.com/use-target_blank/ https://css-tricks.com/use-target_blank/ I'd recently gotten a feed reader set up and CSS-Tricks was one of the first things added as I trust the writers and insights over the years.
- cantSpellSober 4y agoThe advice about adding a `rel` attr is outdated, modern browsers will do this by default with `_blank` https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4078 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4078