3 ms·
For the US apparently the following is the operating Supreme Court precedent. Ex post facto criminal laws are banned, but not civil laws. https://www.law.corne
by anonymouskimmer 4y ago
For the US apparently the following is the operating Supreme Court precedent. Ex post facto criminal laws are banned, but not civil laws.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-9/clause-3/retroactive-taxes-and-ex-post-facto-laws https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/sec...
> The Supreme Court has generally rejected ex post facto challenges to laws imposing retroactive tax liability.1 In Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, the Court emphasized that not all retroactive laws are ex post facto, as the prohibition on ex post facto laws applies only to retroactive criminal laws.2 The majority further opined: “Laws of a retroactive nature, imposing taxes or providing remedies for their assessment and collection, and not impairing vested rights, are not forbidden by the Federal Constitution.” 3
- klipt 4y agoSo they can't put you in prison directly. But they can levy a tax that's impossible to pay, and then put you in prison for failing to pay taxes...
- anonymouskimmer 4y agoNo. You'd have to read the full text (fairly short) of the link. Anything involving prison time is effectively a criminal law.
- logifail 4y ago> So they can't [..] Umm, having seen what happened over the last three years, and (looking further back) what happened after 9/11, my working hypothesis is that if our elected representatives are placed under enough pressure, then if enough of them act in concert they can rewrite any rules they want to.