Possibly a way to work around United States v. Jones with some plausible deniability or parallel construction. "When we shot the car with the dart there was a c

Possibly a way to work around United States v. Jones with some plausible deniability or parallel construction. "When we shot the car with the dart there was a crime taking place. We then tracked (for several days) using GPS until we were sure the accused was alone at home before making an arrest." How long until some officer abuses it to track an ex?