> But the very definition of reality is what we experience If you're an anti-realist when it comes to science. I suspect a lot of scientists think there's plen

> But the very definition of reality is what we experience If you're an anti-realist when it comes to science. I suspect a lot of scientists think there's plenty of reality we don't experience, such as quarks, dark matter or the interior of black holes. Or what lies beyond our light cone (probably a lot more of the same), given the flat topology that's been measured. Sean Carol has argued for the Many Worlds Interpretation being a true description of reality, even though we can only experience the decohered branch (world) we're on.