> Is art going to be a part of the small amount of things that retain value? It depends on how you define art. Creativity and intelligence are highly correlate

> Is art going to be a part of the small amount of things that retain value? It depends on how you define art. Creativity and intelligence are highly correlated, so if AI capabilities (intelligence) keep going up, it's only a matter of time until AI becomes very good at creating art that is enjoyed and consumed by humans. On the other hand, with a bit of semantic sleight-of-hand, you could re-define art so that it only includes things made by humans, and try to artificially keep the price high that way. But I don't think it will work the way you expect it to. Rather, art made purely by humans will become a status symbol and it will be expensive not due to being technically superior, but due to its relative scarcity compared to AI-generated art. And the market for it will be much smaller than today, due to the overabundance of AI-generated art.