Problem is, gpt understood it to be a criticism, when in reality it is also something said unironically. It sort of proves a point that ambiguity has two meani

Problem is, gpt understood it to be a criticism, when in reality it is also something said unironically. It sort of proves a point that ambiguity has two meanings that are non-discernible without knowing the speaker. And that it exhibited a bias by speaking lenglish. A better example would be how to translate “I am French” from French to English. Does it become “I am French” or “I am English.” Depending on if the tool exists to help tribes talk to each other, or to help them understand each others works, and walk a mile in each others shoes, it might have different design choices. Almost like localizing the speech after translating it.