4 ms·
If they had understood how docker works, it would've been fine, too. But because they didn't and used a software firewall as their only line of defense and didn
by luckylion 4y ago
If they had understood how docker works, it would've been fine, too. But because they didn't and used a software firewall as their only line of defense and didn't bother with authentication for the DB server, it wasn't fine.
- yjftsjthsd-h 4y ago> If they had understood how docker works, it would've been fine, too. They shouldn't have needed to, for this. > But because they didn't and used a software firewall as their only line of defense Okay? That should have been safe. Like, sure, there are ways to add more layers, but that layer shouldn't have failed them. > didn't bother with authentication for the DB server, it wasn't fine. They shouldn't have needed to. Like yes, running a DB without authentication isn't a great idea, but they had good reason to believe that it wouldn't be exposed.
- luckylion 4y agoRunning a server is a lot like doing electrical work. If you don't really know what you're doing and rely on vague intuition about how things should probably work, you might be in for a shock.