3 ms·
Perhaps security should be the next innovation. But I don't think it will be a technical innovation: there's enough tech and know-how to keep script-kiddies out
by tgv 4y ago
Perhaps security should be the next innovation. But I don't think it will be a technical innovation: there's enough tech and know-how to keep script-kiddies out. It's the lack of interest, the hunt for the MVP, the break-fast culture.
> I personally think they are utter trash.
In this case, even criminal, given the extortion attempt.
- jacquesm 4y ago> there's enough tech and know-how to keep script-kiddies out I think that this is true for the parties that have the budget for a proper security team. But your average programmer is not able to keep up with both the very rapid evolution of the security scene, a bunch of tooling to build their application with (backend, frontend) and then the burden of writing the application itself. Even with an interest, and without the urge for an MVP or the subscription to 'break-fast' you are essentially a sitting duck given enough time. After all there is an army of attackers out there and you are just you. I have a ton of ideas of how I could make my current project much better by adding a service. But I'm not going down that route because I know I will inevitably end up in an arms race that will stop me from being able to focus on the application and that will shift more and more resources to the security domain. So instead the app is limited in functionality and only works using local storage in the browser, everything else is utterly static. It's a dumb and very much brute force solution but it works. It is also severely limiting.