They haven't decided details like this. The actual notice of proposed rulemaking [1] explicitly asks for feedback on this: > 117. We also seek comment on wheth

They haven't decided details like this. The actual notice of proposed rulemaking [1] explicitly asks for feedback on this: > 117. We also seek comment on whether we should establish exceptions...? How often are toll calls or usage-fee-inducing mobile calls and text messages made to hotlines? > 145. Are there any potential inconsistencies between the rules that we might adopt to ensure the privacy of calls and text messages to hotlines and other Commission rules or state regulations? For example, would omitting toll calls that incur separate charges from consumers’ bills conflict with our truth-in-billing rules? Are there any other potential inconsistencies? Should we explicitly resolve them and, if so, how? What role might disclaimers issued by service providers play? It also sounds like the sought some industry comment already and had any "insurmountable" objection: > 112. ...We note that there is no discussion of such concerns in the record in response to the Notice of Inquiry ... Indeed, neither of the two trade associations representing substantially different segments of what would be covered providers and/or providers of wireline voice service raise insurmountable issues relating to selectively omitting calls and text messages from call and text logs. I also suspect most domestic volence hotlines are toll free. [1] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-9A1.pdf https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-9A1.pdf