And that his like the point of Rust? It put in the spotlight this stuff. You could see the seeds of Rust from years ago, but having a nice language as the star

And that his like the point of Rust? It put in the spotlight this stuff. You could see the seeds of Rust from years ago, but having a nice language as the start is just... the start. Rust do that AND all the other things: tooling and docs and.. So, the thing that will replace Rust will need that, and is likely you will not see any proper* contender in the next 5 years, maybe even more... *ie: One where it worth to rewrite the codebase. You will see several experiments, maybe a few very good, but consider this: To rewrite from C/C++/.. to Rust have a lot of leverage: C performance, superior tooling, superior error messages, superior docs. Your Rust replacement should be BETTER than that.