i love how this question became a parallel discussion about the CEO responsibility to the board, but NOBODY addressed the main point. if no one can mention how

i love how this question became a parallel discussion about the CEO responsibility to the board, but NOBODY addressed the main point. if no one can mention how a deal with MS does not KILL the company, how can they defend that a deal was the best? CEO et al job is to maximize value for the company. not to serve shareholders that want to make a quick buck turning around shares.