I feel like that point was equally made with “colorless green ideas sleep furiously” Moreover, in linguistics 101, students are often introduced to case studie

I feel like that point was equally made with “colorless green ideas sleep furiously” Moreover, in linguistics 101, students are often introduced to case studies of people with aphasia and similar issues which illustrates how humans can produce coherent and grammatical speech without meaning (just like chatgpt) and how people can lose the understanding of certain classes of words. Lastly, NN are often seen as a way to model functions (again, students are often asked to produce different logic gates by hand, to convince themselves that NN can be Turing complete) so rather than language being inherently probabilistic chatgpt might just have reasonably inferred the rules of language.