I didn't. Ironically, you (or the juniors you're referring to in your original comment) missed the context in the book. You said he presents it as a rule, witho

I didn't. Ironically, you (or the juniors you're referring to in your original comment) missed the context in the book. You said he presents it as a rule, without explanation or example, but you happened to cherry pick the one paragraph from the 13 pages of Meaningful Names that didn't have an explanation or example. You're right, the problem is vagueness, and that context is already set a few pages prior. It would be redundant to repeat the same reasoning.