To clarify my position: I believe the generated text is indistinguishable from human-generated reasonings and is most probably true in most cases (probably no f

To clarify my position: I believe the generated text is indistinguishable from human-generated reasonings and is most probably true in most cases (probably no factual error). However, on average, ChatGPT content will contain more errors than humans (who it can be assumed want to see the truth), and therefore, it should be put in the same bucket as both “propaganda facts” and “con artist facts”. It’s still facts, just misleading.