I don't think it's true that people wouldn't have noticed; the email still has incorrect information and somebody would (should) have brought up, if nothing els

I don't think it's true that people wouldn't have noticed; the email still has incorrect information and somebody would (should) have brought up, if nothing else, the lack of proofreading. FTA: >The body of the initial email mentions “Peabody” once and does not use any other Vanderbilt-specific terms. It also refers to multiple “recent Michigan shootings”; however, only one incident occurred.