3 ms·
Extending your argument, why then should we not test drugs and medical procedures on human beings, if there's no distinct difference from humans to rats to micr
by photochemsyn 4y ago
Extending your argument, why then should we not test drugs and medical procedures on human beings, if there's no distinct difference from humans to rats to microbes? It's fairly obvious that if the objection to rounding up a bunch of human beings for use in sacrificial drug testing and other research is based on rights, ethics, morality,legality and so on, then why doesn't that concept of of ethical morality extend to clearly conscious animals?
- Dalewyn 4y agoObjectively I have no objections with tests on human subjects, humans are just another animal in the animal kingdom and just another living being like any other living being. The only difference, if we can call it that because it's superficial, stems from human biases where humans are "one of us" whereas other species are "not us". That's it. From an objective perspective of living being, there is no difference between humans and other species including singular cell organisms.