4 ms·
It should gracefully fail and call for the hole feature to be redefined.
by tohnjitor 4y ago
It should gracefully fail and call for the hole feature to be redefined.
- ezst 4y agoAgreed. I have no problem with this looking and feeling like a rebase operation in a version control system: fix the "conflict" to continue re-applying the sequence of changes linearly, drop steps along the way that are irrelevant or edit those needing to. I'm not even sure FreeCAD's editing model is anything like that (on the surface it seems that it understands geometries but disregards the process to obtain them).
- tohnjitor 4y agoDoes FreeCAD have a feature tree like in Solidworks or Inventor? It's an excellent system and makes it easy to switch from one software to another.
- regularfry 4y agoIt is, and in a lot of cases you will get exactly that: an error at a certain point in the list of operations that you need to fix up so that the rest of them can be done on top of it. The entire reason that the topological naming problem is such a problem is because it breaks FreeCAD's understanding of the sequence of operations.