3 ms·
If you could do this over again, would you still choose socket.io for websockets, or would you go with something else like PusherApp?
by eaurouge 15y ago
If you could do this over again, would you still choose socket.io for websockets, or would you go with something else like PusherApp?
- dodger 15y agoToday I'd consider going with a service, but first I'd see how https://github.com/LearnBoost/websocket.io https://github.com/LearnBoost/websocket.io looks. Most of our problems have been with abstractions in the socket.io client and scaling issues with server process chatter. The chatter shouldn't be necessary with websockets-only.
- Rauchg 15y agoWith https://github.com/LearnBoost/engine.io https://github.com/LearnBoost/engine.io the abstractions are greatly simplified, which is what I'm announcing today. The socket.io codebase has been shrunk dramatically, and it's as a result easier to scale/maintain.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- dodger 15y agoThat's great!