5 ms·
> We use it quite a lot, along with co-pilot to test the waters Can you shred some lights on how co-pilot is doing comparable?
by TowerTall 4y ago
> We use it quite a lot, along with co-pilot to test the waters
Can you shred some lights on how co-pilot is doing comparable?
- llamaLord 4y agoInterestingly, I've found copilot has been getting seriously dumber I feel. Seemingly simple things that I could Google in 5 mins (which I feel is really really what copilot is good for) it seems to be struggling more and more with. This weekend I asked it to write "an event listener that listens for when a user cmd + clicks and binds the event to the onCmdClick function" in a Vue app. I tried around 3 different variation's of the prompt, it just COULD NOT figure out that it needed to check if the cmd key was down. All it would do is just bind "click" events to the function I mentioned.
- devjab 4y agoI think it's hard to compare the two because of how you approach them. We dismiss the co-pilot suggestions a lot, but it's not like we get the same amount of suggestions from chatGPT because you more actively have to seek it out. If that makes sense. I think co-pilot is eventually going to compete with a lot of the auto-generation tools that exist today. Like, you can auto-generate REST controllers in C# if you're not doing the whole Odata with generic <T> controllers, and Microsoft has made a tool for that, but in the future, it'll likely be co-pilot that handles that sort of thing.