>Clearly there's not agreement in what is classified as conscious, given this thread/article. There is general agreement. We agree for most things like rocks a

>Clearly there's not agreement in what is classified as conscious, given this thread/article. There is general agreement. We agree for most things like rocks and humans..there are a few things where we aren't sure, like chatGPT. But in general humans are in agreement for most things. >Just because there are some classifications on which people agree about the label this doesn't imply they agree upon all classifications. Well just because ambiguities for certain things exist doesn't preclude the existence of things that are utterly clear to be conscious or unconscious. We know humans are conscious and we know humans have all the required parameters to make them classified as conscious. We just can't deduce the exact thresholds and features that cause a phase shift when changed. But we know these parameters exist.