4 ms·
It's interesting math. You can turn natural gas into heat directly at around 90% if it's plumbed to the building. You can turn natural gas into electricity at a
by hunter2_ 4y ago
It's interesting math. You can turn natural gas into heat directly at around 90% if it's plumbed to the building. You can turn natural gas into electricity at around 50%. You can turn electricity into heat (resistive) at 100%. You can pump ambient heat inside using electricity at 300% (depending on several factors; adjust as appropriate).
Therefore the choice is between a gas furnace at 90%, or gas to electricity to a heat pump at 150%, if we care about the efficiency of gas usage between the two options.
But when comparing price per kWh of delivered gas vs electricity, ignore the 50% gas-to-electricity efficiency, because that's irrelevant. It's just the 90% vs 300%.
Therefore a gas furnace is cheaper if the delivered price per kWh of gas happens to be no more than 30% that of electricity in your area. Of course the rate for gas will more likely be in therms than kWh, but that's a simple conversion (1 therm = 29.3 kWh).
I suppose that's the case in Texas?
- dd36 4y agoGas leaks from distribution are something to consider too.
- elcomet 4y agoIn your first two paragraphs, you seem to be assuming that the only way to produce electricity is gas.. which is fortunately not the case
- hunter2_ 4y agoI should've quoted to avoid confusion, but I am replying to a comment talking about heating with gas vs this: > if natural gas is cheap it can also be used to generate electricity without having to run and maintain natural gas lines to every house