4 ms·
I assume the fraudulent papers were the ones that claimed ivermectin was effective against covid?
by m348e912 4y ago
I assume the fraudulent papers were the ones that claimed ivermectin was effective against covid?
- gutitout 4y agoYou’re kidding, right?
- sbaiddn 4y agoWhy would you assume that? You'd have to read a scientific paper to reach that conclusion (or do the experiment yourself) and the trustworthiness of that is what is at issue!
- yyyk 4y agoThat was most of them. But I recall at least one deceptive Lancet paper arguing against ivermectin which was also fraudulent. Lancet has a long long problem with controversial papers with the 'right' opinion which get far less scrutiny than required.
- pessimizer 4y agoI think you're thinking of hydroxychloroquine, but your point stands. Surgisphere: mass audit of papers linked to firm behind hydroxychloroquine Lancet study scandal https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sapan-desai-lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-mass-audit-scientific-papers https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sa...
- refuse 4y agolol, the same journal that referred to women as "bodies with vaginas."
- accuratitis 4y agoNot sure why you are downvoted. They have bodies which sometimes have vaginas. The clorox society police is out in full force on HN.