4 ms·
> I'll bet you didn't think twice about the integrity of doing that. "You" however is "readers on HN" and they very very likely did think about the integrity.
by jjtheblunt 4y ago
> I'll bet you didn't think twice about the integrity of doing that.
"You" however is "readers on HN" and they very very likely did think about the integrity.
Your point stands, of course, that the sleight of hand/speech is an attempt to pull a fast on one readers in general.
- wolverine876 4y agoI don't find most HN commenters think critically about integrity or accuracy. IMHO, * Many follow the crowd in attacking whoever is the target, and sometimes that includes raising questions about integrity, etc. * Many attack the integrity, etc. of everything, which isn't thinking critically - it's the opposite.
- jjtheblunt 4y agoi've noticed that your observations are true increasingly often the last year or so, in contrast to years earlier on HN. it's very disappointing.