Article in search of a problem IMO. It can't even articulate what the 'misconception' is in the first paragraph. It uses fancy words but misses its points for f

Article in search of a problem IMO. It can't even articulate what the 'misconception' is in the first paragraph. It uses fancy words but misses its points for fluff. >We’re convinced these tools might be the superintelligent machines from our stories because, in part, they’re trained on those same tales. That's it. That's the only mention of the 'misconception' the entire article is based on. Really confused what this article is trying to accomplish.