4 ms·
The rationale is that 2FA was being abused by some telcos with sockpuppets at a net cost of (ostensibly) some 50+Million a year for twitter. If that's true, an
by ZoF 4y ago
The rationale is that 2FA was being abused by some telcos with sockpuppets at a net cost of (ostensibly) some 50+Million a year for twitter.
If that's true, and because it's the least secure MFA option, I don't see it being that difficult or controversial of a decision.
I also do enjoy that this is listed as an 800% increase, not really how 0->$8 works.