3 ms·

Which in turn has inspired the creation of PrivacyProtect [0]. It allows to do basically the same thing as the other applications, but in my opinion the interfa

Which in turn has inspired the creation of PrivacyProtect [0]. It allows to do basically the same thing as the other applications, but in my opinion the interface is better, it also allows you to directly select a file which I guess is easier than copying the contents, it also means you can just select an image file for instance or some other type of file other than a web page. [0]: https://www.privacyprotect.dev/ https://www.privacyprotect.dev/

DanielBMarkham 4y ago
Why is everybody forcing me to upload to the web the very files I want to keep private to myself? If any code in the universe should run locally, it's this kind of code. I don't get it. Great UI, though. But I still don't get it.
- cuttysnark 4y ago
  That the frontend is hosted on someone else's server is a convenience, but I see your point and agree. Technically nothing is uploaded anywhere, nor does it call any APIs to do the de/encryption. Instead, it uses the cryptography mechanisms built into your browser. Local file access and creation are via FileSystem api[0]. Said differently, you could save the page to your desktop—ensure all the includes are to local files, and still run it. In fact, thats's what I did with Portable Secret[1] which others noted was previously posted here. I can confirm this works and nothing "calls home". [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem [1] https://mprimi.github.io/portable-secret https://mprimi.github.io/portable-secret
- mprime1 4y ago
  That project and the parent do exactly what you wish: - run encryption locally - do not upload anything You may not realize that’s the case because it’s a web form
- filoleg 4y ago
  > Why is everybody forcing me to upload to the web the very files I want to keep private to myself? This isn't the use-case I had in mind. My personal one: I want to build a small utility web app for a very specific task, and it would be used by me and by some of my friends (less than 10 users total). The entire thing can easily be front-end code, which is nice, because I can just host it on Netlify and not bother with hosting, managing it, etc., thus making the complexity of it all much lower. But there is one catch - the web app uses an external API, and, along with it, the API access key. This puts a big stop sign for making it front-end only. And I don't want to up the level of complexity by managing the back-end just for the API access key retrieval (for a webapp used by less than 10 people). Exposing the API key in the front-end code on a publicly accessible website is one of the worst ideas I can think of. I haven't done the evaluation on how well the solution in the OP would serve my specific purpose, but it looks promising.

DanielBMarkham 4y ago

Why is everybody forcing me to upload to the web the very files I want to keep private to myself? If any code in the universe should run locally, it's this kind of code. I don't get it. Great UI, though. But I still don't get it.

cuttysnark 4y ago
That the frontend is hosted on someone else's server is a convenience, but I see your point and agree. Technically nothing is uploaded anywhere, nor does it call any APIs to do the de/encryption. Instead, it uses the cryptography mechanisms built into your browser. Local file access and creation are via FileSystem api[0]. Said differently, you could save the page to your desktop—ensure all the includes are to local files, and still run it. In fact, thats's what I did with Portable Secret[1] which others noted was previously posted here. I can confirm this works and nothing "calls home". [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystem [1] https://mprimi.github.io/portable-secret https://mprimi.github.io/portable-secret
mprime1 4y ago
That project and the parent do exactly what you wish: - run encryption locally - do not upload anything You may not realize that’s the case because it’s a web form
filoleg 4y ago
> Why is everybody forcing me to upload to the web the very files I want to keep private to myself? This isn't the use-case I had in mind. My personal one: I want to build a small utility web app for a very specific task, and it would be used by me and by some of my friends (less than 10 users total). The entire thing can easily be front-end code, which is nice, because I can just host it on Netlify and not bother with hosting, managing it, etc., thus making the complexity of it all much lower. But there is one catch - the web app uses an external API, and, along with it, the API access key. This puts a big stop sign for making it front-end only. And I don't want to up the level of complexity by managing the back-end just for the API access key retrieval (for a webapp used by less than 10 people). Exposing the API key in the front-end code on a publicly accessible website is one of the worst ideas I can think of. I haven't done the evaluation on how well the solution in the OP would serve my specific purpose, but it looks promising.