3 ms·
I get that this is one frame for how one uses money: > What am I getting for my money? But it's not the only frame, and I think it's vastly overapplied. Betw
by wpietri 4y ago
I get that this is one frame for how one uses money:
> What am I getting for my money?
But it's not the only frame, and I think it's vastly overapplied.
Between various online newspapers, magazines and Patreon-supported writers and whatnot, I spend probably $2k/year. What do I get out of it personally? Very little. But the world gets quite a lot out of good journalism, and I'd say the world needs a lot more of it.
I get that fundamentalist capitalism wishes to squeeze everything into the mold of dollar-denominated quid-pro-quo exchanges. It's certainly a useful frame on many occasions, but it's ultimately a bit me-me-me for my tastes. I have no opinion on this particular project, but in general I think we should find a way to support things that are useful to lots of people, because otherwise those things tend to go away.
- monero-xmr 4y agoYou are talking about charity, I am talking about commerce. Charity has its place and can be sustained if properly executed. There is only so much that can be donated however. When you provide the market test, the bar is a lot higher for sustainability.
- wpietri 4y agoWell now you at least admit there are two things in the world. What if there were more than two?