4 ms·

Forgive me, I may not have worded that correctly. By empty, I simply meant that the game stopped being interesting after a while. The single player game was on

Forgive me, I may not have worded that correctly. By empty, I simply meant that the game stopped being interesting after a while. The single player game was only so replay-able, and multi-player is a very different game that doesn't suit me. What Civ has is a great community, but that community had no way to experience content together. Hand crafted scenarios that people can play simultaneously and share their experiences isn't a multiplayer element, it's a community element.

BlueTemplar 4y ago
But as a community element it already exists ? https://forums.civfanatics.com/forums/civ4-game-of-the-month.165/ https://forums.civfanatics.com/forums/civ4-game-of-the-month...
BlueTemplar 4y ago
P.S.: Actually, these are such good ideas that Brian Reynolds added them to Civ2 back in 1996, before you could even expect players to have Internet access ! https://www.filfre.net/2023/01/sequels-in-strategy-gaming-part-1-civilization-ii/ https://www.filfre.net/2023/01/sequels-in-strategy-gaming-pa... (And leaderboards might be even older, dating back to Civ1, considering how Sid Meier with Civ (and his other games) emphasized roleplaying and surviving to the end of the game rather than «winning», whatever that means ?)