> caps his hours at 26 per week, keeping him part-time, and ineligible for benefits. Benefits should not be yes/no at some hours-per-week cutoff. Or really, t

> caps his hours at 26 per week, keeping him part-time, and ineligible for benefits. Benefits should not be yes/no at some hours-per-week cutoff. Or really, they shouldn't be a thing. Fix any tax bs that makes it cheaper for employers to pay for them rather than employees and remove any rules that say employees have to provide them. ... err, I guess time off might count as a benefit, so make sure any rules scale linearly all the way to zero. How much an employee costs shouldn't have sudden jumps at particular numbers of hours. Employees shouldn't depend on their employees for anything more than a (fungible, because it's just money) paycheck.