3 ms·
> involves the use of workers' fingerprints to access pay stubs and company computers Maybe: requiring fingerprint to access your pay is effectively coercion.
by tantalor 4y ago
> involves the use of workers' fingerprints to access pay stubs and company computers
Maybe: requiring fingerprint to access your pay is effectively coercion.
- donatj 4y agoPay stub, not pay. Very different things
- wpietri 4y agoGiven the rampant level of wage theft in this country, not so different at all.
- NoZebra120vClip 4y agoIf these employees are receiving any sort of public benefit, or become involved in some legal claim, or basically just need to prove their income to someone, they will absolutely require pay stubs. If they're not able to come up with proof of income, they could be denied Medicaid, Social Security, Section 8 housing assistance, SNAP "food stamps", WIC, TANF, or all sorts of other benefits that they would be entitled to, if only they could prove that they're earning a legitimate income from their employer who is required to provide pay stubs in an accessible fashion (they used to be simply attached to the paper check, or mailed via postal service; how complicated was that?)