4 ms·
Notably https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241 > We attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system, KataGo, by training adversaria
by stevenhuang 4y ago
Notably https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241
> We attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system, KataGo, by training adversarial policies that play against frozen KataGo victims. Our attack achieves a >99% win rate when KataGo uses no tree-search, and a >77% win rate when KataGo uses enough search to be superhuman. Notably, our adversaries do not win by learning to play Go better than KataGo -- in fact, our adversaries are easily beaten by human amateurs. Instead, our adversaries win by tricking KataGo into making serious blunders. Our results demonstrate that even superhuman AI systems may harbor surprising failure modes
- sorokod 4y agoThe only reason we call those failure modes surprising is that we anthropomorphise the AI. Entirely understanble, we all do it and it may become a serious issue.