4 ms·
Obviously, detection of who blew up the pipeline. If you can detect the means, then you have a lead for the culprit. What kind of question is this? All it does
by scythe 4y ago
Obviously, detection of who blew up the pipeline. If you can detect the means, then you have a lead for the culprit.
What kind of question is this? All it does is make me think you're being intentionally obtuse. Anyone who blew up the pipeline — or committed any other crime —would try to cover their tracks, unless they were planning to take credit (which they weren't). That's how you always commit crimes!
- tptacek 4y agoHow exactly does detecting a remote detonation give you attribution? Google this: a lot of different entities do underwater remote detonation. The one thing you wouldn't want to do is to park a big, beaconing Alta-class minesweeper precisely over the thing you later blow up!
- scythe 4y agoIt doesn't immediately give you attribution, but like any other clue, it could contribute to an evidence base that eventually leads to a suspect. Again, this is basic criminology, and you're a security researcher. Why are you suddenly unable to make these connections?